There are, however, notable exceptions, including a commercial property at 2601 E. The vast majority of the properties that Dames & Moore deemed eligible for the historic registry are in north Palo Alto neighborhoods that date back to the city's founding, including Crescent Park, Downtown North, Professorville and University South. "By it not being listed in local inventory, we no longer have the ability to stop that." "SB 9 eliminates that discretion," Lait said. SB 9 allows homeowners to forego the individual review process and build their homes by right. Planning Director Jonathan Lait noted that before SB 9, a developer who wanted to demolish a home that is deemed eligible for a historic listing and replace it with a new two-story home would have to go through the city's "individual review" process, which gives city staff discretion in reviewing the project and requiring environmental analysis. is among those that was deemed eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Levy noted in his letter that the state Department of Housing and Community Development is well aware of Palo Alto's history of opposing SB 9. Last week, state Attorney General Rob Bonta notified Pasadena that its ordinance is "illegal and must be repealed."
Finale inventory palo alto code#
1, the city revised its zoning code to add a host of new "objective standards" for SB 9, which govern details such as rooflines, window placements to garage styles.Įconomist Stephen Levy suggested that council members' use of the historic registry to prevent redevelopment "certainly does draw attention to their defiant attitude." He alluded to Pasadena's attempt to designate certain areas as "landmark district" to make them ineligible for SB 9. Just before the state law took effect on Jan. The council's move faced some backlash from residents who framed it as just the latest attempt by the city to defy SB 9, a law that it had publicly and vehemently opposed. "And the council can say, 'Your property is a historic resource.'" The HRB (Historic Resources Board) could disagree and say, 'We know you don't want it to be, but we still recommend that the council make it on the list,'" Tanner said. "There would be a process with public hearings where they can say, 'We don't want it to be (listed).
Finale inventory palo alto series#
Would you mind if we list it on the local registry?" There would also be a series of public hearings in which the property owners can voice their support or opposition before the Historic Resources Board, which would make a recommendation on each property and forward it to the council for a final decision.
As such, they could be subject to demolition if property owners choose to take advantage of the new state law.Īssistant Planning Director Rachael Tanner said under the new approach, the city would be basically saying to the property owners: "Your property is historic. The city's planning staff had estimated that about 130 of the properties listed in the 2001 survey are single-family homes. Despite this determination, the properties have not actually been listed on the registry and, as such, remain eligible for redevelopment under SB 9. The effort will focus on the dozens of properties that the city's consulting firm, Dames & Moore, identified as eligible for designation on the National Register of Historic Places after a citywide survey that it had completed in 2001. Now, it will be the city leading the charge on getting some of these properties listed, potentially over the homeowners' objections. To date, it has been up to the property owner to initiate the process of getting their homes listed for the historic registry, with the city acting in a supporting role. Citing a desire to protect local landmarks from demolition and redevelopment, the Palo Alto City Council agreed Monday to review dozens of homes for possible inclusion on a historic registry, which would shield them from Senate Bill 9.īy a 6-0 vote, with Tom DuBois absent, the council moved to effectively upend the city's traditional approach to getting homes listed on the local, state or federal registries of historically significant properties - a designation that would exempt them from SB 9, a new state law that allows homeowners to build up to four dwellings on properties where a single home currently stands.
0 kommentar(er)
